NURS FPX 6026 Assessment 1 Critical Evaluation of Contrary Perspectives and Creating Buy-In for the Interprofessional Approach

Critical Evaluation of Contrary Perspectives and Creating Buy-In for the Interprofessional Approach

Opinions challenging the interprofessional approach usually arise from worries about resource distribution and a conventional inclination towards finding a cure. These contrasting views require critical assessment within the context of managing SCD. A common argument against an interprofessional care model is its resource intensiveness. Critics argue that the costs, in terms of money, personnel, and logistics required to uphold a comprehensive care team, may not be warranted given the limited healthcare resources (Winn et al., 2023).

However, this argument tends to overlook the potential for long-term cost-effectiveness of the model. Enhanced disease management from a coordinated approach can reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits, thereby reducing healthcare expenses. Furthermore, this approach emphasizes preventive care, early detection, and management of complications, all of which can improve patients’ quality of life and potentially increase life expectancy. Thus, while the initial investment may be significant, the long-term benefits and cost savings could outweigh these costs (Phillips et al., 2022).

Another argument proposes a focus on cure-oriented research instead of disease management. While finding a cure for SCD is essential, this does not negate the necessity for high-quality, comprehensive care. The journey to finding a cure is often long and uncertain, and patients with SCD cannot be left with subpar care while waiting for a potential cure. The immediate need is to improve disease management to relieve symptoms, prevent complications, and improve quality of life (Korkortsi, 2021).

NURS FPX 6026 Assessment 1 Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations

Addressing these counterarguments objectively is vital to gaining acceptance for the interprofessional approach. Advocating for a balanced view where resources are allocated to both the ongoing search for a cure and the provision of comprehensive care could help reach a consensus. It’s crucial to emphasize the long-term benefits of the interprofessional approach, which includes potential cost savings, improved patient outcomes, and enhanced quality of life for individuals with SCD.

By highlighting the personalized and holistic nature of interprofessional care, we can address the unique challenges faced by individuals with SCD, including psychosocial stressors and systemic inequalities, often overlooked in traditional care models. Thus, the interprofessional model should not be seen merely as an additional expense, but as a necessary shift towards a more equitable and patient-centered healthcare system.

Conclusion

SCD management in the African American community necessitates a comprehensive, interprofessional approach. Despite potential disagreements about resources and research focus, critically evaluating these perspectives can enable a more effective buy-in for this approach. Employing clear communication strategies and respecting diverse perspectives can enhance patient-centered care, improving life quality for SCD patients. Hence, this paper underscores the value of an interprofessional approach to SCD management, highlighting its potential benefits to patients and the healthcare system.

References

Brandow, A. M., Carroll, C. P., Creary, S., Edwards-Elliott, R., Glassberg, J., Hurley, R. W., Kutlar, A., Seisa, M., Stinson, J., Strouse, J. J., Yusuf, F., Zempsky, W., & Lang, E. (2020). American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: Management of acute and chronic pain. Blood Advances, 4(12), 2656–2701. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851 

Constantinou, C. (2020). Health-related quality of life and health behaviors in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Eprints.mdx.ac.uk. Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/29936/ 

Korkortsi, R. E. K. (2021). Assessment of quality of care for children with sickle cell disease in the south tongu district of Ghana: Nurses’ perspective. Asian Journal of Research in Nursing and Health, 4(4), 58–74. http://research.asianplos.com/id/eprint/159/ 

Phillips, S., Chen, Y., Masese, R., Noisette, L., Jordan, K., Jacobs, S., Hsu, L. L., Melvin, C. L., Treadwell, M., Shah, N., Tanabe, P., & Kanter, J. (2022). Perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease on barriers to care. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265342.